Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life. Which do you consider to be the major influence? model answer: Today the way we consider human (psychology) and mental development is heavily influenced by the genetic sciences. We now understand the importance of (inherited) characteristics more than over before. Yet we are still unable to decide whether an individual’s personality and development are more influenced by genetic factors [nature] or by the environment [nurture]. Research, relating to identical twins, has highlighted how significant inherited characteristics can be for an individual's life. But whether these characteristics are able to develop within the personality of an individual surely depends on whether the (circumstances) allow such a development. It seems that the experiences we have in life are so (unpredictable) and so powerful, that they can (boost) or over-ride other influences, and there seems to be plenty of research findings to confirm this. My own view is that there is no one major influence in a person's life. Instead, the traits we inherit from our parents and the situation and experiences that we encounter in life are (constantly) interacting. It is the interaction of the two that shapes a person's personality and dictates how that personality develops. If this were not true, we would be able to (predict) the behavior and character of a person from the moment they were born. In conclusion, I do not think that either nature or nurture is the major influence on a person, but that both have powerful effects. How these factors interact is still unknown today and they remain largely (unpredictable) in a person's life.
